Sergey Lavrov :. United States to destabilize the situation in Ukraine

Sergey Lavrov :. United States to destabilize the situation in Ukraine

Kiev's Junta and parallel og history

It is now evident that the Kiev junta and its handlers in the West are treating the spontaneous resistance of the people in Ukraine to the coup and its fascism as a counterinsurgency problem. At this stage, their objective is to demobilize it (hence the emphasis on "deescalation" in the Geneva Agreements from last Thursday), to contain it, behead it (by arresting as many leaders as possible) and by intimidating the protest with deadly attacks and terror reserved for streets and apartments. For the junta and its handlers, the key is to survive till the "elections" (May 25) and declare one of its oligarchs (most likely Poroshenko) the winner so that the junta, the US, the EU, NATO, and Western media can claim the "legitimizing" effect of the fake elections. In the meantime, in places under its control, the regime is carrying out so-called lustration--a weird term already used in Eastern Europe after 1989. It is basically a euphemism for purges and sanctions against employment. Originally, lustration was a religious term for cleaning bloodguilt or pollution incurred, for example, by contact with a corpse, which stood here for the old regime and people associated with it. The methods traditionally varied from mild to very harsh. In the case of Ukraine in the hands of the oligarchs who now combined their power with avowed fascists, lustration is to be seen as putting the Nuremberg Principles in reverse. Among one of the pillars of the post-WWII order in Europe was supposed to be so-called denazification, which was, however, very quickly abandoned in those parts of Germany that became Western Germany. Step by step putting some of the results of World War II in reverse was already a process that was systematically launched by the US and its allies vis-a-vis the most ardent anti-fascist people in the Balkans--the Serbs. The other (and closely related) problem of the Serbs was that they were also the most pro-Russian people in the Balkans (at times, the Bulgarians claimed this honor, but somehow they could not quite deliver). The gradual and somewhat guarded reversal of the Nuremberg Principles also took off in Ukraine from the moment of its independence, that is, from the moment of a construction of its new "nationhood" on the basis of ethnic nationalism defined in the Banderite spirit and built on hate for Russia, the Russians, and the Russian language. In other words, that's that sort of "nationalism" that often fuels genocide and cleansing. Under Ukrainian President Victor Yuschenko, who was ushered with Julia Tymoshenko into power by the US-engineered Orange Revolution, the reversal of the movement of Western civilization from fascism actually quite few leaps and bounds. When it comes to Ukraine, the actions of the outgoing U.S-backed, “democratic” president Viktor Yushchenko provide an illuminating case in point. In May 2007, Yushchenko awarded Roman Shukhevych with the title “Hero of Ukraine.” Besides being anti-Russian and anti-communist, Shukhevych also held the SS rank of Hauptsturmfuhrer in World War II, bestowed on him by the German Nazi regime. On January 22, a few days before leaving the office of President, Yushchenko also gave the Hero of Ukraine title to Stepan Bandera. Bandera was the leader of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) created in 1942 by anti-Russian and anti-communist Ukranian nationalists under the aegis of the Nazi occupiers. Under Yushchenko and his light of “hope,” streets in several cities were named after Bandera, and a monument was erected in Lvov. In December 2010, the New York Times reported the release of the U.S. National Archives’ study, Hitler’s Shadow: Nazi War Criminals, U.S. Intelligence, and the Cold War based on a sampling of newly declassified 1,100 C.I.A files and 1.2 million Army counterintelligence files. The documents identify Bandera’s troopers as “a militant fascist organization.” On July 6, 1941, they adopted a decision that the Jews “have to be treated harshly…. We must finish them off…. Regarding the Jews, we will adopt any methods that lead to their destruction.” Citing from the declassified documents, the report further says:

“When the Bandera gangs seize a Jew, they consider it a prize catch. The ordinary Ukrainians feel the same way…. they all want to participate in the heroic act of killing a Jew. They literally slash Jews to pieces with their machetes … Bandera men … are not discriminating about who they kill; they are gunning down the populations of entire villages.… Since there are hardly any Jews left to kill, the Bandera gangs have turned on the Poles. They are literally hacking Poles to pieces. Every day … you can see the bodies of Poles, with wires around their necks, floating down the river Bug.” On a single day, July 11, 1943, the UPA attacked some 80 localities killing perhaps 10,000 Poles.

After the War, the CIA hired Bandera and charged him with numerous tasks—including terrorism. Citing CIA’s own documents, the National Archives’ report explains:
Bandera intended to create a dictatorship in exile … According to U.S. Army CIC observers, the Foreign Section OUN routinely used intimidation and even terror against political enemies. CIC reports listed Bandera as “extremely dangerous” because he was willing to use violence against Ukrainian rivals in Germany. He also continued terror tactics against anti-Banderist Ukrainian leaders in Western Europe. One source said in September 1947 that Banderists were recruiting more members in DP camps, their main recruiter being Anton Eichner, a former SS officer. … By August 1947 Banderists were represented in every Ukrainian DP camp in the U.S. zone as well as in the British and French zones. … He was “constantly en route, frequently in disguise,” with bodyguards ready to “do away with any person who may be dangerous to [Bandera] or his party.” … As for Banderist activities before and during the war, U.S. intelligence officials seemed to understand little beyond Bandera’s implication in the Pierecki assassination. They understood nothing of the Banderist role in ethnic cleansing during the war. … In April 1951 CIA officials tried to convince MI6 to pull support from Bandera. MI6 refused. They thought that Bandera could run his agents without British support, and MI6 were “seeking progressively to assume control of Bandera’s lines.” The British also thought that the CIA underestimated Bandera’s importance. … British operations through Bandera expanded. … Bandera was, according to his handlers, “a professional underground worker with a terrorist background and ruthless notions about the rules of the game…. A bandit type if you like, with a burning patriotism, which provides an ethical background and a justification for his banditry. No better and no worse than others of his kind….” The BND, the West German intelligence service under former Wehrmacht Gen. Reinhard Gehlen, formed a new relationship with Bandera. "It was a natural union. … Bandera’s personal contact in West German intelligence was Heinz Danko Herre, Gehlen’s old deputy in Fremde Heere Ost who had worked with the Gen. Andrei Vlassov’s army of Russian émigrés and former prisoners in the last days of the war and was now Gehlen’s closest adviser. … Herre, reported the CIA base in Munich is aware of Bandera’s earlier reputation … [Herre] also feels that, in principle, Bandera has more to offer operationally than most if not all other Russian (sic) émigré groups in the West today. … He offered to keep CIA fully informed as to Bandera’s activities in return for a favor. Bandera had been trying to obtain a U.S. visa since 1955 in order to meet with Ukrainian supporters in the United States and to meet with State Department and CIA officials. Herre thought that a visa procured with West German help would improve his own relationship with Bandera. CIA officials in Munich actually recommended the visa in October 1959. But on October 15, 1959, only 10 days after the CIA Munich base made the request, a KGB assassin named Bogdan Stashinskiy murdered Bandera with a special gun …" The coup of February 21-22 under the auspices of the US and the EU and its three "guarantors" in the form of Germany, Poland, and France then begot a reversal of World War II and Nuremberg on a new massive scale. The new oligarchic dictatorship then introduced new systemic lustration of the government and society as one of its very first acts. Nazification of Ukraine. In a country in which nearly 7 million were killed in the Great Patriotic War, with 5,2 million of the dead from the civilian population. These 7 million people were 16% of Ukraine's population then. Who would have thought that such a country would be the one where fascism ought to be reintroduced? Some in Galicia clearly did. So did some of those in Ukraine who turned out oligarchs-billionaires when an elementary teacher is paid an equivalent of $100 a month. And so did some in Washington D.C. and Brussels. But since the junta is also an enterprise of "stealing oligarchs" (see Obama's recent speech in the Hague), these oligarchs are now offering $300 for information that could harm people's antifascist resistance and $10,000 for a head of a pro-Russian rebel.

Ukraine's ultra-right nationalist leader orders mobilization of Right Sector militants

Dmitry Yarosh, leader of Ukraine's Right Sector ultra-right nationalist (Fascists) and Ukrainian presidential candidate, has ordered mobilization of Right Sector militants as pro-federalization protests sweep southeastern Ukraine.

Yarosh, who is wanted in Russia for crimes committed against Russian soldiers in Chechnya in 1994-95, said in a video statement circulated on Saturday: "Considering the current situation, I order all of the Right Sector structures to conduct full mobilization and prepare for decisive actions to protect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country."

Yarosh urged law enforcement forces "not to block Right Sector's efforts", but help it restore law and order in Ukrainian regions.

He accused the central authorities and the Interior Ministry of failing to respond to the events in southeastern Ukraine.

__________________________________________

I hope everyone understands what this beast is capable of. Meanwhile, America and the West led by the hand of his to power! There is evidence that the "right sector" are directly related to Gladio of CIA

Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/news/2014_04_13/Ukraines-ultra-right-nationalist-leader-orders-mobilization-of-Right-Sector-militants-7645/

Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/news/2014_04_13/Ukraines-ultra-right-nationalist-leader-orders-mobilization-of-Right-Sector-militants-7645/

- I am Crimean
- No, no, no, right now need to write I am Kharkovian

NATO

American puppets

Obama and war

Courage and bravery

Lady Gaga wished the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) community of Russia - courage, bravery ... It's already causing homeric laughter! Courage, bravery in homosexuals, wow what is news? People hello, do you not mixed up??

Government turning America into 'electronic concentration camp'

Syrian diary

Israeli war against Palestinian children

Gaza on the brink of a full blown war

About Israel and his defend

Divide and Conquer

Thousands in London occupy outside Israeli Embassy against war on Gaza

‘Bloodshed, torture, medieval darkness brought to Libya with Western involvement’

Extremism Export: US admits arms sent to Syria find jihadists

GOP pushing Syria invasion?

Twitter: the terrorists' new favorite social network?

Are Islamic terrorists still relying on sleeper cells and encrypted correspondence to communicate calls for jihad among other violent extremists? Maybe, but they’re making a splash on Twitter, too.

“On Twitter, they get more reach to expand their propaganda,” London-based researcher Murad Batal al Shishani tells McClatchy this week. Shishani says that while the Internet has allowed terrorists an ever expanding way of communicating with like-minded individuals since the digital age reached its peak, extremists have recently taken an especially fond liking to Twitter, where sending out a short, 140-character message can mobilize masses internationally and at a moment’s notice.

In theory, at least.

Shishani says in his research that while Twitter is indeed thought to be an emerging mode of communication among Islamic extremists and foreign terrorist groups, the outlet is acting more like a recruiting tool or newswire than an actual conduit for calls to action.

“They’re focusing on current events – Syria, or supporting a revolution here or there – but they are not using it for operational activity or to communicate among themselves,” the researcher adds. Instead, he insists, a growing number of Internet-inclined terrorists are taking to Twitter so that they can aim for new recruits using one of the fastest growing modes of communication.

“They can reach the ‘swing people,’ and try to attract more sympathizers,” he explains.

In an article published by the New York Times late last year, reporter Jeffrey Gettleman drew attention to a trend of terrorists favoring Twitter as a way of communicating over the Web, claiming, “terrorism experts say that Twitter terrorism is part of an emerging trend.”

Twitter, wrote Gettleman, was usurping previously popular social networking sites among audiences of all sorts, and that was evident within al-Qaeda and other organizations as well. In that instance, though, Gettleman wrote that one particular microblog account — one tied to the press office of Somalia’s Harakat al-Shabab al-Mujahedeen — might be shut down by US authorities.

“American officials say they may have the legal authority to demand that Twitter close the Shabab’s account, @HSMPress, which had more than 4,600 followers as of Monday night,” they Times wrote last year. At the time, Trevor Timm of the Electronic Frontier Foundation mocked Congress’ likely call for a removal of the account in question, saying on his own Twitter account, “How fast does Joe Lieberman release a statement today saying we should censor the Net in the name of national security? I bet before noon.”

Now nearly a year since the @HSMPress account made headlines, McClathcy says that terrorist-tied Twitter accounts are indeed still in existence, but don’t seem to be doing anything that unexpected.

“On the feeds I read, they’re not tweeting anything outlandish,” the Center for Strategic Studies’ Will McCants tells McClatchy. “Maybe they blew up a tank or killed two dudes.”

Even after Congress allegedly considered shutting down the @HSMPress account, McCants says doing as much today would do little to garner America another victory in its war on terror. Given the ever growing number of accounts across the world, it might also be impossible.

“There’s not a lot to be gained from taking it down,” McCants says. “The fear is: ‘Oh my God, they’re on Twitter, how far could their propaganda reach?’ Once you calm down, you see that the only people who get excited about it are geeky intel analysts and fans they already have.”

'West wants Libyan oil, country set for ruin like Iraq and Afghanistan'